Dave Filoni’s Star Wars Lineup: Why Fans Are Worried — A Project‑By‑Project Read

Hook: Why fans—already swamped—should pay attention now

Too many choices and too few trusted signals: that’s the daily reality for Star Wars fans in 2026. With Kathleen Kennedy’s exit and Dave Filoni’s promotion to co‑president of Lucasfilm, a familiar anxiety has flickered back to life. Will the next era correct course or simply double down on franchise fatigue? If you’ve ever felt burned by a hyped project that fizzled—or confused by a slate that seems to recycle the same characters—this read is for you.

Quick take — the most important facts first

What changed: On Jan 15–16, 2026 Lucasfilm announced leadership changes: Kathleen Kennedy stepped down and Dave Filoni was elevated to a co‑president/creative lead role alongside Lynwen Brennan. Industry coverage from The Verge and a critical read of the new slate by Paul Tassi at Forbes immediately raised alarms about the projects currently in development.

Why it matters now: Filoni’s appointment signals a shift toward an internally curated, lore‑heavy strategy. That plays to his strengths but can also amplify certain risks: insularity, character overreach, and a production pipeline that prioritizes franchise continuity over quality and surprise.

Bottom line: Fans’ worries aren’t only fandom noise; they map to real creative and industrial red flags. But there are concrete fixes Lucasfilm can apply fast, and Filoni’s stewardship can work—if he chooses structural changes alongside creative ones.

Context: What Forbes and other outlets flagged (Jan 2026)

Paul Tassi’s Forbes piece — headlined that the “new Filoni‑era list of Star Wars movies does not sound great” — argued that the announced slate skews safe, repetitive, and low on buzz. The Verge’s reporting on Filoni’s promotion framed the decision as a bet on a creator with deep franchise knowledge who also comes from animation and serialized TV.

“We are now in the new Dave Filoni era of Star Wars… the list of in‑development Star Wars projects raises a lot of red flags.” — Paul Tassi, Forbes, Jan 16, 2026

Those pieces set the table: industry observers see a tension between Filoni’s celebrated strengths (worldbuilding, character work, serialized pacing) and the commercial pressure to rapidly expand theatrical product after a multi‑year pause.

What Dave Filoni brings—and where his strengths can become liabilities

• Strengths: encyclopedic knowledge of Star Wars lore, proven ability to shepherd character arcs across animation and live action (The Clone Wars, Rebels, The Mandalorian).
• Opportunities: rebuild fan trust with character‑led, risk‑taking pieces; use serialized sensibility to create theatrical stories with clear stakes and distinct tonal identities.
• Risks: echo chamber decision‑making, overreliance on established IP and fanservice, difficulty translating TV pacing to theatrical scale, and potential neglect of diverse creative voices.

Project‑by‑project read: parsing each in‑development item and the red flags

For clarity we separate projects into categories that reflect what’s been announced or widely reported by trade coverage in late 2025 / early 2026. Where titles are unconfirmed, we analyze the project type and likely pitfalls.

1) The Mandalorian & Grogu (confirmed / definite)

Red flags: The Mandalorian brand is already omnipresent on Disney+. Turning a serialized TV hit into a tentpole feature risks several problems: tonal mismatch (small, intimate Mando stories don’t automatically translate to big‑budget spectacle), sentimental overreach (Grogu as mascot reduces dramatic stakes), and franchise stretching where the film undercuts the TV canon rather than expanding it.

How to course‑correct:

• Keep the film narratively distinct: set it far enough away from episode continuity so it can stand on its own.
• Treat Grogu with restraint—give the character a credible, mature arc that raises stakes rather than relying on cuteness for marketing.
• Use theatrical scale for story reasons (stakes, scope, character stakes), not just spectacle; let the director make choices that differ from TV style.
• Consider a festival or limited international pre-release to build critical momentum rather than pure blockbuster rollout.

2) High‑profile director projects (Taika Waititi and filmmakers like him — reported)

Red flags: Big‑name auteurs bring cachet, but can also create a mismatch between director brand and franchise needs. Delays, re‑writes, and the director’s public persona can overshadow the film. Studios sometimes sell these as auteur tentpoles while simultaneously micromanaging—they become neither auteur films nor coherent franchise entries.

How to course‑correct:

• Agree a clear creative mandate up front: is this a director‑driven detour or a central canon piece?
• Set contractual timelines with built‑in creative checkpoints — not to limit artists, but to avoid years of drift.
• Put a dedicated Lucasfilm producer in the room who can protect franchise continuity without stifling the director’s voice.

3) Expansion of live‑action TV properties into film or vice versa (reported trend)

Red flags: Conflating TV and film markets can erode the distinct value of both. If every TV success becomes a movie and every movie spawns a show, audiences may feel there’s no risk: everything becomes a spin‑off and nothing surprises.

How to course‑correct:

• Create a ‘format map’ for each IP: explain why a story benefits from TV length vs theatrical compression.
• Protect individual showrunners and directors so cross‑format moves don’t dilute authorship.
• Use data to inform decisions—but let human curators set creative thresholds (e.g., a story must pass a narrative‑coherence test before shifting format).

4) Animated and legacy projects rooted in Filoni’s strengths (likely)

Red flags: Filoni’s animation background is one of his biggest assets—but animation can be treated as ‘lesser’ content or pigeonholed as children’s fare. That leads to underinvestment in stories that could reach adults and awards voters.

How to course‑correct:

• Position certain animated projects for prestige runs—submit them to festivals and awards categories to change perception.
• Leverage animation to explore mature themes (intimacy, politics, moral ambiguity) that benefit from the medium’s freedom.
• Cross‑promote with live‑action in ways that enrich both rather than cannibalize attention.

5) ‘Legacy’ Skywalker‑era revivals or returns (rumored / fan speculation)

Red flags: Bringing back Skywalker era staples or retconning past arcs to chase nostalgia is a common pitfall. It can generate short‑term buzz but long‑term resentment if it undermines established stories.

How to course‑correct:

• Favor new lenses on legacy themes instead of direct revivals—explore the consequences rather than resurrect the past.
• Set firm rules for continuity: avoid ad‑hoc retcons that only serve marketing moments.

Case studies: what worked and what failed (lessons Lucasfilm should use)

Success: Andor and Rogue One (crafting stakes within the franchise)

Andor succeeded because it treated the Star Wars universe like a place where smaller, morally complex stories could breathe. Rogue One performed theatrically and earned goodwill because it made a clear gamble: a wartime heist that reshaped our perception of the Rebellion. These are templates for Filoni—a willingness to let a story be grim, contained, and surprising.

Failure (and caution): Solo and big tentpole misfires

Solo’s troubled production and uneven marketing are a reminder that big budgets with unclear creative vision can create PR nightmares. Lucasfilm needs production discipline and narrative clarity—two things that often get sacrificed when the studio chases quick franchise growth.

Industry context in 2026: trends that will shape Filoni’s decisions

• Streaming saturation and subscription fatigue: Late 2025 data shows consumers are prioritizing high‑quality, appointment TV and theatrical events. That raises the bar for both Disney+ exclusives and films.
• AI and VFX workflows: Studios are using generative tools more, speeding up production but creating questions about creative authorship and visual consistency—areas that demand new guild negotiations and transparency.
• Global box office expectations: International markets now decide tentpole success. Stories that are too inwardly fan‑serving with dense lore risk underperforming abroad.
• Social media fandom intensity: Fan reaction cycles are faster and often decisive; early narrative leaks or perceived missteps cause long tail reputational damage.

Actionable playbook: how Filoni and Lucasfilm can fix the red flags fast

These are concrete moves that will protect creative quality and rebuild fan trust.

1. Publish a clear creative roadmap: make public what’s in development and why—this reduces rumor and helps set expectations. Building stronger direct community signals (beyond headlines) helps; see approaches for reviving local trust and community platforms.
2. Establish a small‑team greenlight test: every project must pass narrative, tonal, and marketplace checks before full production funding.
3. Split canon stewardship from production oversight: separate the lore guardians (ensuring continuity) from the showrunners and directors who have creative freedom.
4. Give projects distinct bibles: each film/series must have a one‑page ‘why this story now’ and a tone guide that differs from existing properties.
5. Invest in diverse writers and indie directors: bring fresh voices who aren’t already part of the Lucasfilm echo chamber; commit to mentorship and clear timelines.
6. Use staggered release strategy: avoid back‑to‑back Star Wars releases that cannibalize attention; mix prestige streaming with theatrical events strategically. Thoughtful distribution and platform choices (including how platforms compensate creators) matter here.
7. Lean on festival strategy and critics early: preview screenings for critics and festivals can build credibility beyond fandom chatter.
8. Adopt transparent AI policies: state upfront how AI was used in VFX and script development to avoid backlash and guild strife.

A checklist for fans and industry watchers

Want to know if a Filoni‑era project is on the right track? Look for these signs:

• Does the project publish a clear storytelling premise and tonal bible?
• Is it led by a creative team with distinct credits (not just recycled franchise staff)?
• Has Lucasfilm set measurable quality gates (script approval, test screening results)?
• Is the marketing promising a story rather than selling nostalgia or a mascot?
• Are festival screenings and critic previews part of the rollout?

Final verdict: Why fans’ worries are valid — and also solvable

Paul Tassi’s Forbes critique captured the immediate reaction to the Filoni slate: skeptical. That reaction reflects real risks: an inward‑looking creative culture, a pipeline that favors familiar IP over narrative courage, and the industrial pressures to monetize every successful TV moment into a theatrical product.

But Filoni’s strengths—deep lore knowledge, character empathy, and serialized storytelling chops—are also the precise tools needed to fix those problems. The outcome depends less on who runs Lucasfilm and more on whether the studio changes its process: clearer mandates, more diverse voices, and discipline in deciding what truly deserves to be made.

Takeaways — what to watch for in the next 12 months

• Will Lucasfilm publish a public slate and creative roadmaps? (This would be a major trust signal.)
• Do confirmed projects like the Mandalorian & Grogu film adopt a distinct tone and marketing strategy?
• Are big‑name auteur projects given clear mandates and deadlines?
• Does Filoni hire outside creative leadership to avoid an echo chamber?

Call to action

If you care about the future of Star Wars, follow the creative signals, not only the headlines. Subscribe to trusted coverage, support projects that take genuine risks (critically and financially), and demand transparency from Lucasfilm about how the slate is chosen. We’ll be tracking each development project‑by‑project—sign up for our newsletter for in‑depth reads, interviews, and the industry analysis you need to judge the next Filoni era fairly.

Join the conversation: share this piece, comment with what project you’re most nervous about, and tell us which fixes you think Lucasfilm should prioritize.

Related Reading

• Designing Data Centers for AI: Cooling, Power and Electrical Distribution
• EU Synthetic Media Guidelines and On‑Device Voice — Regulatory Watch (2026)
• Opinion: Free Film Platforms and Creator Compensation — An Ethical Roadmap for 2026
• Playful Interfaces: Short‑Form Algorithms, VR, and the Future of Cultural Critique
• Cloud Cost and Performance Trade-offs for Storing Tick-Level Commodity Data
• Replacing Smartwatch Screens and Resealing: UV Glues, Gasket Adhesives and Waterproofing Tips
• PowerBlock vs Bowflex: which adjustable dumbbells are right for your apartment gym?
• Where Artists Should Be: A 2026 Map of Emerging Platforms (YouTube, Bluesky, Digg)
• Cashtags and TikTok Moderation: What Students Need to Know About Investing Conversations on New Social Apps