What 45‑Day Windows Would Mean for Indie Films — And Why Netflix’s Promise Matters
Sarandos’s 45‑day theatrical pledge could calm theaters — but indie and arthouse films need more than a number to thrive.
Why indie film fans and programmers should care about a 45‑day theatrical window — right now
Too many movies, too many streaming options, and too little time: that’s the daily headache for cinephiles, festival programmers, and independent filmmakers in 2026. The latest corporate chess move — Netflix’s proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery — adds a new variable: a public pledge from Netflix co‑CEO Ted Sarandos that, if the deal goes through, WBD titles would get a 45‑day theatrical exclusivity. It’s a hard number that aims to reassure theaters, but what does it actually mean for the indie and arthouse ecosystem that lives and breathes on theatrical runs?
Key takeaway (most important first)
If honored, a 45‑day window from a combined Netflix/WBD would be a moderate win for theatrical visibility — better than aggressive short windows like the reported 17 days — but it won’t automatically fix structural issues indie films face: marketing budgets, screen access, and long‑tail discovery. The promise matters politically and operationally; indie distributors, theaters, and filmmakers need new strategies to turn a contractual window into genuine audience growth.
What Sarandos said — and why it matters
In a January 2026 interview with The New York Times, Ted Sarandos offered a firm metric: if Netflix controls WBD, the company would operate “largely like it is today, with 45‑day windows.” That line was meant to soothe alarm across exhibition chains and signaling bodies who fear the disappearance of theatrical exclusivity. Earlier industry reporting (Deadline) had suggested Netflix might accept something as short as 17 days — a figure that would be transformational and controversial. The public commitment to 45 days is therefore both a negotiation move and a PR gesture; platform policy shifts and public messaging will matter as the deal is reviewed (news on platform policy shifts).
“We will run that business largely like it is today, with 45‑day windows,” Sarandos told The New York Times.
Context: how we got here (short history to 2026)
Understanding the stakes requires a quick tour of industry shifts since the 2010s. Theatrical windows have shrunk incrementally for two decades: studios tested shortened windows and PVOD around the 2010s, experimented heavily during the 2020 pandemic, and some studios embraced day‑and‑date releases in 2021. That experiment provoked backlash from exhibitors and awards voters. Since 2022, the market has moved toward hybrid models: some blockbusters return to 45–90 day theatrical exclusivity, others shorten to 17–30 days depending on franchise strategy and distribution deals.
By late 2025 and into 2026, consolidation accelerated — streaming platforms courting legacy studios — and both regulators and the marketplace pushed for clearer rules around theatrical runs. That’s why a concrete number from Netflix matters: it’s a bargaining chip with theaters, a signal to talent and guilds, and potentially a condition in any regulatory approval of a merger. Regulators will inspect filings and the enforceability of any commitments closely; follow regulatory filings and conditional terms as they appear (industry regulatory analysis).
Why a 45‑day window helps — but not enough
At first blush, 45 days is preferable to a 17‑day window. Here’s what it would do for indies and arthouse films:
- Preserves a discovery runway: A 45‑day exclusive allows films to play multiple weeks in specialty theaters, build word‑of‑mouth, and expand geographically — a crucial cadence for arthouse titles that often grow week over week.
- Supports awards eligibility and campaigns: Traditional awards bodies still expect theatrical runs; a guaranteed window reduces friction for awards strategies.
- Signals to exhibitors: Theaters may be more willing to book Netflix/WBD titles if they’re assured a stable theatrical period, helping indies secure screens that might otherwise go to franchise tentpoles.
But the promise has limits:
- It doesn’t equal marketing: Indie films live or die on P&A. A 45‑day window without meaningful marketing support — national and local — won’t move the needle.
- Screen competition remains: Netflix may prioritize WBD’s mid‑ and big‑budget films for prime playdates, squeezing tiny art‑house titles into fewer rooms or off‑peak slots.
- Revenue models are unclear: Who pays for the theatrical prints, advertising splits with exhibitors, and how streaming revenue is allocated post‑window will shape economics for tiny distributors and filmmakers.
Scenarios: what 45‑day exclusivity could look like in practice
Optimistic outcome
Netflix treats WBD’s specialty arm as a true theatrical-first operation: modest but sustained P&A for prestige and indie titles, coordinated festival strategies, and negotiated revenue shares with exhibitors. Indie films benefit from better screen access and festival-to-theater pipelines. A 45‑day window becomes a platform for discovery, not just a checkbox.
Realistic (likely) outcome
Netflix guarantees 45 days for WBD‑branded titles, but most marketing budgets flow to franchise and tentpole releases. Specialty titles get theatrical runs, but distribution remains uneven, forcing many indies to rely on festivals, targeted engagements, and post‑window streaming placements to recoup.
Pessimistic outcome
The 45‑day pledge becomes a headline while actual practice places indie films on secondary platforms or limited showtimes. The combined Netflix/WBD prioritizes algorithmic optimization on platform releases; theatrical becomes a brief prestige play rather than a true distribution channel for indies. To understand how algorithmic prioritization affects discovery, see design strategies for privacy-first personalization and platform ranking (privacy-first personalization).
Actionable strategies for indie filmmakers and distributors (what to do now)
Promises at the corporate level matter, but survival for independent films depends on practical moves. Here are concrete steps that will matter in 2026:
- Negotiate minimum theatrical commitments: When signing distribution deals, require explicit P&A spending thresholds, guaranteed weeks of play in top markets, and the right to extend runs if box office momentum builds.
- Design festival-to-theater pipelines: Use festival premieres to create local theatrical partners. Lock in roll‑out plans before festival launches so theatrical bookings and press can start immediately after key reviews drop. Case studies on serialized micro‑event campaigns can help you structure repeat engagements that extend a run (serialized micro-event campaigns).
- Leverage event cinema: Convert initial theatrical runs into repeatable events — director Q&As, revival nights, specialty programming blocks — to keep seats filled across a 45‑day span. Think about evolving live talk and Q&A formats as programming tools (evolution of live talk formats).
- Bundle marketing with exhibitors: Negotiate co‑op ad dollars or local advertising matches. Small distributors can stretch budgets by sharing ad buys and social amplification with theaters.
- Use data to prove demand: Track pre‑sale metrics, geotargeted engagement, and festival attendance to demonstrate potential to exhibitors. Concrete numbers unlock better screen allocation; invest in measurement tools and cataloging approaches (data catalog field tests).
What theaters should do to protect arthouse programming
Exhibitors aren’t powerless. A 45‑day promise can be an opportunity if theaters act strategically:
- Prioritize curation: Lean into branded programming blocks — “Indie Nights,” “Directors Series” — to create loyal audiences who return beyond single releases.
- Negotiate flexible splits: Push for tiered revenue sharing where indie titles keep a higher portion of early weeks to reward discovery.
- Partner with streaming platforms carefully: Use short‑term rental or rental pooling deals to secure exclusivity on titles that perform locally, even if national distribution favors larger chains. Technical questions about low-latency streaming and hybrid premieres can influence how platforms and theaters coordinate (low-latency live-stream playbooks).
- Invest in community building: Memberships, subscriptions, and patron programs smooth revenue volatility and create audience guarantees for indie bookings.
How film festivals and programmers can adapt
Festivals are the discovery engine for indies — they must not be sidelined by corporate window deals:
- Lock theatrical partners early: Work with local theaters to convert festival premieres into immediate limited runs.
- Use hybrid premieres smartly: When festivals offer online components, make them marketing windows (clips, filmmaker interviews) rather than alternative distribution channels that cannibalize theatrical demand. Hybrid and online festival tools rely on reliable platform infrastructure; platform choices and their cloud stacks matter (NextStream cloud platform review).
- Encourage staggered rollouts: Staging releases (NYC/L.A. first, then national expansion) can prolong theatrical legs within a 45‑day exclusivity period.
For cinephiles: how to keep supporting the ecosystem
If you love indie and arthouse films, your choices matter more than ever:
- Buy tickets early — opening weekend momentum drives expansions.
- Join memberships at local arthouses and repertory cinemas.
- Share word‑of‑mouth: social chatter and festival buzz still convert to ticket sales.
- Attend events and Q&As — they increase lifetime value of a theatrical attendee and can be folded into repeatable micro-events (serialized micro-event case studies).
Wider industry implications and regulatory context in 2026
Promises like Sarandos’s can carry weight with regulators and exhibitor coalitions. In early 2026, the Netflix/WBD story remains under scrutiny from rivals and potential regulatory review. A concrete 45‑day commitment can be part of a remedy package or a public relations strategy to mitigate antitrust concerns. Trade groups and theater chains will watch the fine print: are those windows legally binding, and how do they apply across territories and specialty distribution arms?
There’s also a labor angle. Guilds and unions (producers, writers, actors) continue to negotiate compensation tied to streaming versus theatrical revenue. A stable theatrical window can influence residual calculations and bargaining positions — another reason the number matters beyond audiences and exhibitors. Keep an eye on platform policy changes and crisis communications around enforcement and remedies (futureproofing crisis communications).
Measuring success: what metrics to watch
Indie stakeholders should track metrics beyond box office grosses:
- Per‑theater averages (PTA): Early PTA shows demand intensity and helps argue for expansion.
- Week‑over‑week retention: A healthy arthouse title holds >50% into week two and shows expansion in week three and four.
- Conversion from festival to theater: Measures how festival buzz translates to paid attendance.
- Lifetime streaming conversions: How many theatrical viewers later watch on platform — valuable for downstream revenue models.
What to watch next — short checklist for the coming months
- Monitor regulatory filings and any conditional terms attached to the Netflix/WBD deal.
- Track early window enforcement: are WBD titles actually staying 45 days in major markets?
- Watch distribution case studies: which indie titles get marketing support, and how do their theatrical legs compare to pre‑deal comparators?
- Follow guild negotiations about residuals tied to theatrical windows and streaming windows.
Final analysis: why Netflix’s promise matters — and why action matters more
Promises from platform executives move markets and calm worried constituencies. Ted Sarandos’s public commitment to a 45‑day theatrical window is a tangible concession in the Netflix/WBD narrative: it acknowledges theaters’ role and offers a structure that could benefit indie and arthouse films — but only if stakeholders convert the promise into practice.
Independent filmmakers and distributors must treat a guaranteed window as a baseline, not a victory. The real work comes in negotiating marketing, securing screenings, and building audience momentum within that window. Exhibitors should use this moment to demand transparency and equitable terms. Festivals and programmers must double down on pipeline strategies that turn premieres into theatrical legs. And audiences — your attendance and subscription choices — remain the decisive variable.
Actionable next steps (quick checklist)
- Distributors: add theatrical minimums to contracts; require co‑op marketing clauses.
- Theaters: create membership events tied to indie premieres; negotiate tiered splits.
- Filmmakers: prioritize festival premieres with clear theatrical follow‑ups; ask for P&A guarantees.
- Cinephiles: support local screenings, buy tickets early, and promote films you want to see thrive.
Want to stay updated?
We’ll be tracking how the Netflix/WBD story unfolds, whether the 45‑day pledge holds in contracts, and which indie titles benefit or lose ground. Sign up for our weekly newsletter for granular case studies, box office deep dives, and distribution playbooks tailored to indie filmmakers and programmers. Also watch forecasts for platform models and free film platforms as the market adapts (future forecast: free film platforms 2026–2030).
Call to action: If you care about independent cinema, don’t wait for corporate promises to translate into action. Support your local theaters, demand clarity from distributors, and join the conversation below — share a recent indie theatrical run that surprised you, or tell us what you want to see from a true theatrical-first approach. For practical tips on running live Q&As and evolving event formats, see resources on the evolution of live talk formats and how to run repeatable event programming (evolution of live talk formats).
Related Reading
- Future Forecast: Free Film Platforms 2026–2030 — Five Predictions
- Practical Playbook: Building Low‑Latency Live Streams on VideoTool Cloud (2026)
- Case Study: How a Local Shelter Raised $250K with a Serialized Micro‑Event Campaign
- NextStream Cloud Platform Review — Real-World Cost and Performance Benchmarks (2026)
- Stretching a Prebuilt Gaming PC Into an Arcade Powerhouse: Aurora R16 and RTX 5070 Ti Options
- Top 10 Tech Accessories That Double as Jewelry (Smartwatches, Smart Rings & More)
- From Auction House to Wardrobe: How to Create Affordable Renaissance-Themed Accessories
- Quick Winter Comfort Pack: What to Pack for One- or Two-Night Cold Camps
- Regional Grocery Vocabulary: Explaining Japan’s ‘Postcode Penalty’
Related Topics
filmreview
Contributor
Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.
Up Next
More stories handpicked for you