After Kathleen Kennedy: What Her Exit Means for the Future of Star Wars on Film and Disney+
Star WarsIndustryStudio News

After Kathleen Kennedy: What Her Exit Means for the Future of Star Wars on Film and Disney+

UUnknown
2026-02-24
10 min read
Advertisement

Kennedy’s exit reshapes Lucasfilm: which Star Wars projects will survive, pivot to streaming, or be shelved?

Hook: Why Kathleen Kennedy’s Exit Matters to You (and What to Watch Next)

If the relentless churn of new Star Wars announcements has left you exhausted — unsure which movies will actually land, which streaming shows will be worth your time, or whether to renew Disney+ — Kathleen Kennedy’s departure from Lucasfilm is a seismic moment that changes the calculus. Fans and subscribers want clarity: which projects survive, which pivot to TV, and which quietly die in development limbo?

Executive summary — the big takeaways up front

Short version: Kennedy’s exit accelerates a shift Lucasfilm began in late 2025: prioritize coherent franchise storytelling, protect the most bankable and critically lauded streaming series, and put original or high-risk theatrical experiments on the back burner. Expect projects closely tied to existing characters and Filoni-era continuity to be protected; standalone, far-flung epics (including the announced Rey standalone that Kennedy oddly omitted) are the most vulnerable.

Survive

  • Established streaming series and shows tied to the Filoni/Andor/Ahsoka continuity (high confidence)
  • Projects with built-in fanbases or strong creator attachments (e.g., Donald Glover's Lando if retooled for streaming)
  • Lower-budget, serialized stories that can live profitably on Disney+

Pivot

  • Big-budget theatrical experiments (e.g., James Mangold’s Dawn of the Jedi) — likely deferred, reworked, or shifted to streaming and miniseries format
  • Standalone films with uncertain box office pull — may be reframed as origin stories or integrated into TV arcs

Shelved

  • Director-driven, high-concept theatrical pieces with little connective tissue to franchise continuity — top candidates for shelving (e.g., Soderbergh/Ben Solo)
  • Projects Kennedy omitted publicly (notably the Rey standalone announced at Celebration 2023) — omission is a signal, not a verdict

Context: What Kennedy actually said — and what she left out

In a January 2026 interview with Deadline (reported widely by outlets including Polygon and IGN), Kennedy gave a candid status report on several Star Wars films in development. Highlights:

  • James Mangold’s Dawn of the Jedi — described as having an “incredible” script but now “on hold.”
  • Steven Soderbergh’s Ben Solo project — said to be on the “back burner” despite a finished, strong script.
  • Finished scripts exist for Donald Glover’s Lando and Taika Waititi’s film, but neither is guaranteed to move forward.
  • Strikingly, Kennedy did not mention the standalone Rey movie announced at Star Wars Celebration 2023 with Daisy Ridley and Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy, despite that project previously being a high-profile reveal.
"We're pretty far along," Kennedy told reporters in 2023 about the slate. In 2026, her update reads as a recalibration: some things are delayed, some are reshaped, and a few classic ideas no longer fit Disney’s strategy.

Why omission matters: decoding the silence on the Rey project

In the film business, what a studio leader chooses not to repeat publicly often matters as much as what they do say. The Rey standalone was introduced on-stage with fanfare at Celebration 2023; Kennedy’s silence about it in her final interview is significant for three reasons:

  1. Reprioritization of coherence: New Lucasfilm leadership is likely to emphasize linkage to the Filoni-era continuity. A Rey standalone that focuses on founding a new Jedi Order might be framed as a sequel to The Rise of Skywalker, which remains polarizing. That makes it an easier target for de-prioritization.
  2. Budget vs. audience potential: A Rey film with a large A-list cast and effects scope may be a poor fit for Disney’s 2025–26 emphasis on measured spending and predictable returns.
  3. Creative changeover: Leadership transitions often trigger creative reassessments. New presidents frequently shelve legacy projects to put their stamp on the franchise.

Who’s likely to lead Lucasfilm next — and how that shapes decisions

As of early 2026, Lucasfilm’s leadership is moving toward a more collaborative regime with Dave Filoni (creative steward of animation and the Disney+ ecosystem) elevated and executive operations rebalanced. Filoni’s track record: consistent viewership and critical goodwill for serialized, character-driven storytelling (e.g., The Mandalorian, Ahsoka, Andor). That baggage gives him and allied projects institutional protection.

Meanwhile, studio-side executives will be under strong pressure to show quarterly improvements to Disney’s streaming margins. The consequence: theatrical gambles that don’t clearly boost franchise cohesion or streaming subscriptions will need heavier justification.

Project-by-project forecast: survive, pivot, or shelf

High confidence to survive

  • Filoni-era streaming series and direct continuations (Ahsoka, Andor lineage): These shows are cheap to amortize into subscriber retention and build durable fandom. Expect Lucasfilm to keep investing in serialized storytelling that creates cross-promotional lift for Disney+.
  • Smaller-scale character pieces that fit franchise continuity: Limited series that flesh out established figures (e.g., spinoff miniseries from characters introduced in The Mandalorian) are likely to get the green light because they have lower risk and help retain subs.

Medium confidence — likely to pivot

  • Donald Glover’s Lando: A finished script exists, but a theatrical Lando could be recast as a prestige Disney+ limited series or event series. Glover’s star power and jazz-infused tone suit streaming’s episodic character work better than a tentpole box office gamble.
  • Taika Waititi’s film: Waititi’s voice matters to audiences and critics, but his brand of offbeat comedy may be repackaged. Expect either a smaller theatrical release positioned as counter-programming or a limited series that allows tonal nuance to breathe across episodes.
  • James Mangold’s Dawn of the Jedi: Though Mangold’s script was praised, a 25,000-years-before-the-main-saga epic is a gamble that breaks audience expectations. The most plausible pivot is adaptation into a multi-season streaming origin saga, allowing worldbuilding without a $200M theatrical risk.

Low confidence — likely shelved

  • Steven Soderbergh & Adam Driver’s Ben Solo: Despite a “just great” script, Kennedy herself called it unlikely to proceed. Without an obvious tie to surviving continuity and with uncertain box-office appeal, this one is a prime shelving candidate.
  • Standalone Rey film (announced 2023): Kennedy’s omission is the clearest signal here. Unless new leadership publicly recommits, treat this project as effectively paused or quietly dead.

Why streaming-first is the smart move for many projects in 2026

Late 2025 and early 2026 saw streaming platforms double down on measured content investment. Disney’s own recalibration favors:

  • Series that sustain subscriber retention over one-off theatrical spikes
  • Lower up-front costs and greater flexibility to iterate on story arcs
  • Cross-pollination between shows — a small investment that seeds multiple spin-offs

For Lucasfilm, a serialized format reduces risk for high-concept ideas (like Dawn of the Jedi) while preserving creative ambition. It lets creators worldbuild without the pressure of a single box-office weekend defining success.

Practical advice for fans: how to prioritize what to watch and where to invest

If you’re a subscriber lost in a sea of announcements, here’s a tactical checklist.

  1. Prioritize Filoni-connected shows. These are Lucasfilm’s current hedges: watch them first if you want canon that’s likely to stay relevant.
  2. Keep an eye on project format changes. If a film disappears from release calendars but creators remain attached, it may re-emerge as a Disney+ limited series. Sign up for alerts from trusted outlets (Deadline, Variety, The Hollywood Reporter) or follow creators’ verified channels.
  3. Don’t commit solely based on announcements. A 2023 reveal has little predictive power in 2026; look for production starts, casting confirmations, release windows, and studio marketing campaigns.
  4. Curate watchlists for continuity not chronology. If you want to understand where Lucasfilm is heading, prioritize recent critically performed entries (Andor, Ahsoka) that shape tone and character choices.

For creators and industry observers: opportunities and risks

Creators pitching to Lucasfilm in 2026 need to demonstrate three things:

  • Franchise connectivity: How does the story enhance or dovetail with existing arcs?
  • Cost-conscious delivery: Can the idea succeed as a limited-run series or a mid-budget theatrical release?
  • Serialized potential: Will it retain subscribers over multiple weeks or seasons?

Industry observers should watch executive hires closely. New decision-makers historically reset development slates — that’s often a moment for both creative pruning and renewed strategic clarity.

Case studies: how similar shifts played out across 2025–2026

Look at Marvel and other flagship IP in late 2025: Disney paused or retooled several projects, prioritizing series that fed long-term audience retention (e.g., serialized character studies) and shelving stand-alone features that lacked a clear streaming tie. That playbook is now being applied to Star Wars.

Another instructive pattern: when creators with strong auteur profiles (e.g., Waititi, Soderbergh) are involved, studios tend to preserve the creative relationship but change the commercial vehicle — turning a risky blockbuster into a prestige limited series that serves both creative and business aims.

What would a rationalized Star Wars slate look like in 2027–2029?

Imagine a balanced Lucasfilm program that respects both innovation and subscriber economics. A plausible slate:

  • Yearly flagship streaming season (The Mandalorian/Ahsoka-style event) tied to major character arcs.
  • Selective theatrical tentpoles that directly feed streaming (e.g., a major film that sets up a multi-season series).
  • Origin and side-story limited series (Lando, Dawn of the Jedi reimagined) that expand the universe on a sustainable budget.

Risks to monitor — and how fans can read the tea leaves

Three red flags that a project is structurally endangered:

  1. Public omission from leadership updates (as with the Rey film).
  2. Repeated shifts in creative team or release windows without production starts.
  3. Scripts completed but no casting or financing moves — often a sign the studio is holding it for strategic reasons rather than immediate forward momentum.

Actionable takeaways: what to do now

  • If you’re a fan: Refresh your watchlist — prioritize newer Filoni-connected shows to stay in the loop for future crossovers.
  • If you subscribe to Disney+ for Star Wars: Keep an eye on release calendars and production updates before deciding to renew. Short-term pauses may reflect strategic pivots that ultimately deliver better storytelling.
  • If you follow industry news: Track executive hires and the studio’s public statements. Leadership tone often predicts the kinds of projects that get the green light.
  • If you’re a creator: Pitch serialized, character-driven concepts that can flex between streaming and theatrical models.

Final verdict — why this transition could be good for Star Wars

Transitions are disruptive — but they also create space for clarity. Under Kennedy, Lucasfilm expanded aggressively, announcing a dizzying slate. The post-Kennedy era appears intent on doing fewer things, but doing them better: tighter continuity, smarter budget allocation, and a greater emphasis on serialized storytelling that fans and critics have increasingly rewarded since 2020.

That does mean some announced projects will not reach screens as originally conceived. But for fans who value coherent worldbuilding and steady quality over endless cinematic experiments, the next few years could deliver a leaner, more satisfying Star Wars on both film and Disney+.

Call to action

Want ongoing, spoiler-controlled coverage of how the Lucasfilm slate evolves in 2026 and beyond? Subscribe to our newsletter for weekly development roundups, production trackers, and deep-dive analysis — and join our next podcast episode where industry insiders decode the future of Star Wars. If you have questions about a specific project, drop them in the comments and we’ll investigate the production signals that matter most.

Advertisement

Related Topics

#Star Wars#Industry#Studio News
U

Unknown

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.

Advertisement
2026-02-24T02:11:19.842Z